Search results
Search results 1-20 of 335.
Quoted Originally posted by Brockpaine I'm not certain. Two or three people have been using the beta, but I don't ever recall seeing any discussion on adopting it officially. I personaly prefer SS3, I can tell you though dont build a ship in SS3 and convert it to SS2... Bad things happen
Quoted Originally posted by Desertfox Hopefully the American teams will boycott the World Cup like they did in OTL. Peru would boycot as historical, but we didnt even make it in, so we are going to be content to chear for whoever is playing the other SA teams that are there.
Welcome to Aegis, we realy arnt as crazy as rumor has it.
The Peruvian deligation is still protesting...
Quoted Originally posted by Commodore Green Tant, if you need the ship built, i'm sure that your AEGIS allies could do it cheaper! that's what friends are for, after all!! im fairly sure it will be Q3 or Q4 before I can start on any project of this caliber, at which point im fairly sure ill be asking my AEGIS allies for extensive technical assistance on the project, and it will likley be built in an AEGIS ship yard.
This is also an example of where the Peruvian army could be called upon to honor our treaty agreements.
Quoted Originally posted by Brockpaine It's not really a light carrier anymore, IMHO. A light carrier is 12,000 tons and carries 40 planes; this is a small fleet carrier. True, but well its also a matter of how the Navy in question views it. Peru would be using it as a Fleet Carrier, but Light Carrier is more in referance to its displacement.
Final Atempt (for today) CVLX (MkV), Peru Light Carrier laid down 1937 Displacement: 16,000 t light; 16,447 t standard; 18,132 t normal; 19,480 t full load Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught 721.00 ft / 707.00 ft x 88.00 ft x 20.00 ft (normal load) 219.76 m / 215.49 m x 26.82 m x 6.10 m Armament: 6 - 4.72" / 120 mm guns in single mounts, 52.72lbs / 23.92kg shells, 1937 Model Dual purpose guns in deck mounts with hoists on side, evenly spread 6 - 4.72" / 120 mm guns in single mou...
Quoted Originally posted by thesmilingassassin Usually if you want someone shot, send them to do an impossible mission. Like wining more than one game in the world cup prelims...
Quoted Originally posted by Desertfox A certain shadowy character arrives with an offer, a second-hand carrier in good condition for that battleship, no questions asked. DF: The Secratary for Military Surpluss informs the Shadowy character that he is sure he can present a better offer. TSA: Im not sure how serious I am about selling her, just that she dosnt realy have a slot in my ideal fleet.
Quoted Originally posted by Brockpaine Quoted Originally posted by Tanthalas For referance you can generaly figure in topics like this im not serious . Am I pleased that Peru only managed to win one game no, but thats the breaks. I obviously misunderstood some things you posted, and for that im sorry, I also accept your apology. Did I mention im not very happy with the National Disgrace peru is aparently calling a Football team (and if you think it isnt confusing talking about Football and Foot...
Quoted Originally posted by Brockpaine I don't have the money at present, but if I did it'd be amusing to have a museum fleet composed of several Huascars. (I have the previous and more famous one, as historical!) Edit: Though honestly, I think you should keep a hold of it for coast-defense and training crews... ROFL it depends, im working on what I want my Goal fleet to look like, and if the offers are high enough Husacar is expendible.
atm the Peruvian Government is interested in offers for Huascar this fine 3 Owner Battleship recived Major work in 1931. It is capable of 23.90 kts. Mounts 8X305mm Main battery, and has a 320mm Main belt.
For referance you can generaly figure in topics like this im not serious . Am I pleased that Peru only managed to win one game no, but thats the breaks. I obviously misunderstood some things you posted, and for that im sorry, I also accept your apology. Did I mention im not very happy with the National Disgrace peru is aparently calling a Football team (and if you think it isnt confusing talking about Football and Football your nuts)
Quoted Originally posted by thesmilingassassin Ok, thats it gentlemen, lets cool things down. Oh im perfectly Cool and Calm. I started out joking about the issue, but Brock took my humor serious, and that made me start to wonder.
Quoted Originally posted by Brockpaine You have to admit that game between Brazil and Peru would make a spectacular scene for a sports movie. Last-second tie, officials huddled together while the crowds and teams wait with baited breath... Quoted Originally posted by Tanthalas I simply have to be content to complain that I think the whole process was slanted in the direction you wanted it No, I mean four people in the sim, not four people who lost. I'll say again that I actually didn't WANT Per...
Qualified: Argentina: 2 wins, 1 loss. Chile: 2 wins, 1 loss. Columbia: 2 wins, 1 loss. Brazil: 1 win, 1 loss, 1 tie. Not Qualified: Mexico: 1 win, 2 losses Canda: 1 win, 2 losses US: 1 win, 2 losses Peru: 1 win, 1 loss, 1 tie as it would require all 4 nations not qualified to ask for a resim, and DF has already stated he is content with the standings... that would only be 3 of us asking even if Canada and the US both wanted it resimed. I simply have to be content to complain that I think the who...
Quoted Originally posted by Brockpaine Brazil versus Mexico: 2 points for victory, goal difference 2 Brazil versus US: 0 points for victory, goal difference now 0 Brazil versus Peru: 1 point for tie, goal difference 0 Peru versus Chile: 0 points for loss, goal difference -3 Peru versus Argentina: 2 points for win, goal difference -2 Peru versus Brazil: 1 point for tie, goal difference -2 Overall: Brazil 3 points, goal difference 0 Peru 3 points, goal difference -2 Is that right? Yes that is cor...
Quoted Originally posted by Brockpaine Quoted Originally posted by Tanthalas Maybe aan invasion of Chile (who obviously riged the results) would do it to Yes please! That way, we can do arms limitations much better than via treaty! well since Chile, Argentina, and Brazil aparently all qualified I realy do think you riged it somehow.
I never understood how these things were decided in The World Cup, Hell till this I thought there couldnt be a tie... (I actualy did think there couldnt be a tie in world cup play)
WesWorld »
Thursday, April 18th 2024, 4:26pm
Go to the top of the page
