You are not logged in.

1

Sunday, December 24th 2006, 8:41am

Destroyer Frack-up

I have royally screwed up some of my destroyer design. I was going back and reviewing them and several violate the cross-sectional strength minimum, and have absurdly low numbers of shells per gun. I would like to correct the designs. All were built before the sim started, so it would not impact any reports or anything like that. The overall impact on my destroyer tonnage would be limited.

O'Brien No change to standard tonnage
Tucker No change to standard tonnage
Sampson No change to standard tonnage
Caldwell from 1,022 to 1,125 standard tonnage (+618 tons)
Wickes from 968 to 1,153 standard tonnage (+9250 tons)

2

Sunday, December 24th 2006, 9:44am

Fine with me...

3

Sunday, December 24th 2006, 10:35am

Ditto (Dita for Hoo's sake)....

HoOmAn

Keeper of the Sacred Block Coefficient

  • Send private message

4

Sunday, December 24th 2006, 11:04am

hehehehe

Fine with me, too.

5

Sunday, December 24th 2006, 12:45pm

No problem here.

6

Sunday, December 24th 2006, 12:57pm

Oh oh, now I've done it, Hoos all twiterpated at the though of Dita.

Canis, I recently responded to the post in Wolfs shipyard forums that deverted to discussion on the Battlestar Valkyrie. I'm wondering if you have a template for those drawings!

7

Sunday, December 24th 2006, 1:09pm

Good here

no problem

8

Sunday, December 24th 2006, 1:11pm

Just posted some screenshots of her there, Wes. I'll try and post my templates there later today. They are mainly just parts from Galactica, Pegasus, and Indra. Not sure how much they would help with Valkyrie since she seems to be quite a different animal all together.

9

Sunday, December 24th 2006, 1:51pm

She seems to be newer given her hull texture, similar to the Pegasus, but this discussion is for the other forums!

10

Sunday, December 24th 2006, 2:04pm

Quoted

Wickes from 968 to 1,153 standard tonnage (+9250 tons)

Looks to me that the new standard displacement of that destroyer is incorrect with that increase. It should now be a cruiser. :)

11

Sunday, December 24th 2006, 2:18pm

I think thats a general tonnage increase for the entire class.

12

Sunday, December 24th 2006, 2:37pm

I know, but somehow my brain registered something else. ^_^;;
which brings us to...

Quoted

The overall impact on my destroyer tonnage would be limited.

I wouldn't really call it limited. Looking at the total destroyer tonnage the US is allowed to have (A+B => 200,000 tons) that additional 9,868 tons is 4.9% of the total DD tonnage. Of the B type tonnage only (160,000 tons), it's 6.1%. I wouldn't really call that 'limited'.

13

Sunday, December 24th 2006, 11:34pm

Well, considering how much I still have available, its relatively limited. :)

14

Sunday, December 24th 2006, 11:37pm

Quoted

its relatively limited.


That depends on how many battlestars are involved.... :D

15

Sunday, December 24th 2006, 11:44pm

I think you mean Star Destroyers, right? After all it is a destroyer thread. :)

Quoted

Well, considering how much I still have available, its relatively limited

Know that of the tonnage you now have, those 9868 tons is about 11% or so. I think that I calculated it at almost 80,000 tons, not including the ships that have been laid down in 1933.

16

Sunday, December 24th 2006, 11:58pm

IIRC the Colonial fleet had 12? Tiger class Destroyers, basically mini battlestars, without the flight pods, just a small hangar in the lower hull, according to the BSG tech site.

HoOmAn

Keeper of the Sacred Block Coefficient

  • Send private message

17

Monday, December 25th 2006, 11:36am

Highjacker alert!!!!

18

Tuesday, December 26th 2006, 7:20am

All your basestars are belong to us!

19

Wednesday, December 27th 2006, 12:13am

EXTERMINATE!!! [SIZE=3]EXTERMINATE!!![/SIZE] [SIZE=4]EXTERMINATE!!![/SIZE]

20

Wednesday, December 27th 2006, 12:49am