WesWorld

Quoted

Originally posted by TexanCowboy
You have two type ones...now, whether you want to use them or not is a whole different kettle.

Also note that you have been sent 2000 additional tonnes by allies in 1937 per quarter and 1000 tonnes by allies in 1938 per quarter.

Which/what Type 1 are you referring to? There were some 600 ton TBs under that designation - Desert Fox did the sim reports for the 1Q37 and 2Q37 - which is where I will be picking up. I'm still assessing the tonnage sharing agreement with my partners - the first and second quarter reports did not seem to include the transferred tonnage.

Things will get worked out.

Thanks!

Having a quick look at the Yugoslavian sim reports for Q1 and Q2 1937, however, it appears Foxy didn't take advantage of the tonnage-sharing coming in from the PRJ allies.

FOXY!

...so, yes. With that in mind, I'd actually propose starting with the Q1 1937 reports and writing up from there, in order to take advantage of that extra 2,000 tons per quarter that wasn't used. Otherwise, well, it's lost.

Edit: a thought occurs. Get it in IP instead of production. You can get 1 IP, enough to set up another Type One slip, or lengthening a smaller slip to a larger.

Quoted

Originally posted by Brockpaine
Having a quick look at the Yugoslavian sim reports for Q1 and Q2 1937, however, it appears Foxy didn't take advantage of the tonnage-sharing coming in from the PRJ allies.

<snip>

...so, yes. With that in mind, I'd actually propose starting with the Q1 1937 reports and writing up from there, in order to take advantage of that extra 2,000 tons per quarter that wasn't used. Otherwise, well, it's lost.

Edit: a thought occurs. Get it in IP instead of production. You can get 1 IP, enough to set up another Type One slip, or lengthening a smaller slip to a larger.

You have answered a question I was going to ask. Just need to confirm numbers with my partners and decide upon a course of action. I like infrastructure improvements - makes jobs, keeps the people happy and employed - etc., etc...

Per the last Yugoslav report, here's the infrastructure for Yugoslavia:

Quoted

2 Factories

Docks and Slips
at Belgrade:
S0
D0

at Bar:
S1
D1
S0
S0
D0

Belgrade is the port on the Danube. I don't think it's really worth improving; the slip and dock there are likely more than sufficient for handling anything large enough to sail above the Iron Gate.

If you get 1 IP from the tonnage-sharing deal - that'd be the equivalent of the 1kton each from Romania and Poland - then I'd consider four different plans, minding the fact that the S1 and D1 at Bar are in use during the relevant quarters:

Quoted

Plan 1
Use 1 IP to build a new Type-1 Slip at Bar.

Post-construction summary:
at Bar:
S1
S1
D1
S0
S0
D0

Quoted

Plan 2
Use 0.5 IP apiece to build two Type-0 slips at Bar.

Post-construction summary:
at Bar:
S1
S1
D1
S0
S0
S0
S0
D0

Quoted

Plan 3
Use 0.5 IP apiece to lengthen the two Type 0 slips at Bar into Type 1 slips.

Post-construction summary:
at Bar:
S1
D1
S1
S1
D0

Quoted

Plan 4
Use 0.25 IP apiece to lengthen the two Type 0 slips at Bar into Type .5 slips; and use 0.5 IP to build a new Type 0 slip.

Post-construction summary:
at Bar:
S1
D1
S.5
S.5
S0
D0

(Please note - S.5, not S5!)

Which I chose would depend significantly on what type of ships I'd plan to build in 1938 and beyond.

(Note - there are a lot of other options available besides those I named - I just picked the four I consider most likely.)

Edit: Linky of Yugoslav reports so we don't have to hunt them down:
1937
- Q2/1937
- Q1/1937
1936
- Q4/1936
- Q3/1936
- Q2/1936
- Q1/1936
1935
- Q4/1935
- Q3/1935
- Q2/1935
- Q1/1935
1934
- Q4/1934
- Q3/1934
- Q2/1934
- Q1/1934

If we are doing that, I might want to go back and edit the 37 reports then, Romania and Poland can send 1 IP in 1937 rather than the 8,000 tons that was sent. As well, 1938 is the year for Poland to gain the benefit so you kinda lose half your tonnage in 1938, something to think about. Romania turn is in 1939, and before I post my 39 reports, now that we seem to have a player for all the PRJ nations I am wondering if we should discuss whether or not we should continue the tonnage-sharing deal? It is abit determental to the Yugo's they do lose half their production for 2 years, whereas for Poland and Romania it is 1/4 and 1/6 respectively. Technically as the "industrial powerhouse" in the PRJ navalwise (1) I should actually be sending tonnage to you and Marek, if there was any tonnage sharing, not the other way around! There are other considerations as well.

(1) Romania is the top tonnage producer in her alliance. How sad is that, no offense to Poland and Yugoslavia.