Quoted
Originally posted by Brockpaine
We have had a few arguments about that in the past, and I'm not certain they're entirely solved. For my part, I've considered the following rule to be ironclad:
+3 years for propeller planes
+0 years for jets, etc.
This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "Tanthalas" (Jan 26th 2009, 7:24am)
Quoted
Originally posted by Tanthalas
so +3 for anything that flys with a Piston Engine and a propeller got it, +0 for anything else (basicly jets and rocket planes) Got it. Kinda sucks LOL I had an awsome Idea for a Jet fighter today.
Quoted
Originally posted by Brockpaine
Quoted
Originally posted by Tanthalas
so +3 for anything that flys with a Piston Engine and a propeller got it, +0 for anything else (basicly jets and rocket planes) Got it. Kinda sucks LOL I had an awsome Idea for a Jet fighter today.
Well, there are some... differences of opinion. I tend to prefer more conservative courses... for instance, Bulgaria just introduced it's first home-designed monoplane in 1937.
Quoted
Originally posted by Desertfox
I see it as you can do whatever you want prototype wise, but cannot have the plane enter service until it meets the +3 rule.
This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "Brockpaine" (Jan 26th 2009, 8:11am)
Quoted
Originally posted by Brockpaine
Quoted
Originally posted by Desertfox
I see it as you can do whatever you want prototype wise, but cannot have the plane enter service until it meets the +3 rule.
Now see, I feel that's something of a dangerous precedent, as it encourages brinksmanship and gets people to try to bend the +3 rule. "Well, no one complained when I made the first prototype three years ago! Why can't I have my toy daddy waaaaah."
Forum Software: Burning Board® Lite 2.1.2 pl 1, developed by WoltLab® GmbH